TREATMENTS &
RESEARCH

Search the
latest
treatment
information
here.

Dr. Huntley's
Diagnosis
Checklist

Have a symptom?
See what questions
a doctor would ask.
 

Do not use oral polio vaccine (OPV) in patients or patients whose contacts have immunosuppression

Do not use oral polio vaccine (OPV) in patients or patients whose contacts have immunosuppression: Excerpt from Avoiding Common Pediatric Errors

Author: Anjali Subbaswamy, MD

What To Do - Make a Decision, Take Action

Live vaccines are composed of viral or bacterial strains that are deprived of their pathogenicity but can still replicate in the organism into which it is injected. These vaccines can provoke a nonpathogenic infection in vaccinated subjects, both inducing an antibody and a cellular immune response. Live attenuated vaccines, such as measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) or yellow fever vaccine, have been widely used with proven efficacy. The oral poliomyelitis vaccine is composed of three attenuated strains prepared from the three wild virus types and is efficacious but mutations of the virus (in particular for type 3) can induce polio-associated paralysis by giving it back its original neurovirulence (number of cases 2:1,000,000). The emergence of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) strains is a real risk associated with the use of OPV. The cVDPV strains result form point mutations that occur in the Sabin (developer of oral vaccine) OPV strains. There may or may not be an exchange of parts of the viral genome with related nonpolio enteroviruses. This exchange typically occurs in areas where the live OPV is used and immunization rates are low. The oral polio vaccine is still used in most parts of the world to prevent transmission (cheaper than injected form). Since the World Health Assembly launched its polio eradication goal, outbreaks caused by cVDPV have been seen in the Amish populations in the United States.

Live bacterial vaccines can be classified as a self-limiting asymptomatic organism that stimulates an immune response to one or more expressed antigens. A nonvirulent or attenuated derivative of the pathogen is used to induce a response to the bacterium itself.

The OPV contains a live virus that is capable of provoking an immune response but not capable of causing disease. Unfortunately, it very infrequently changes to a more virulent form, and some people may maintain the living virus in their bodies, excreting it constantly. The injectable vaccine contains killed virus and is more expensive. The oral vaccine is easier to administer, but at some point, to eradicate all sources of the live virus, its use will have to end. Continuing to use OPV while immunization coverage is not appropriate or optimal and is like playing Russian roulette.

Paralytic poliomyelitis has been a reportable disease since the early part of the century. Since the advent of immunization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued surveillance reports approximately once perdecade.Bythe1970s,theprincipalfocusofthesereportsbecamevaccineassociated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP), which affected both OPV recipients, mostly young infants receiving their first OPV dose, and close contacts of OPV recipients, mostly nonimmune adolescents and young adults who were caregivers to recently immunized infants. Recipients of OPV and contacts of OPV recipients with primary B-cell immunodeficiency had more than a 3,000-fold increased risk of VAPP compared with those with no known immune disorders. Over the years, the proportion of contact cases decreased as polio vaccination rates improved, and the proportion of cases observed among immunodeficient persons increased; perhaps, because of increased awareness of their risk. Nonetheless, immunosuppression or contact with immunosuppressed persons remains an absolute contraindication to the OPV.

Suggested Readings

Gomber S, Agarwal KN. Polio eradication–target 2000. Indian J Pediatr. 1996;63(4):477–483. Kimman TG, Boot H. The polio eradication effort has been a great success–let's finish it and replace it with something even better. Lancet Infectious Dis. 2006;6(10):675–678.
Molrine DH, Hibberd PL. Vaccines for transplant recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2001;15(1):273–305.
Saliou P. [Live vaccines.] [French] Rev Prat. 1995;45(12):1492–1496.

Book Source Details

  • Book Title: Avoiding Common Pediatric Errors
  • Author(s): Anthony D Slonim MD, DrPH; Lisa Marcucci MD
  • Year of Publication: 2008
  • Copyright Details: Avoiding Common Pediatric Errors, Copyright © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

More About Cold sores

More Medical Textbooks Online about Cold sores

Review other book chapters online related to Cold sores:

Medical Books Excerpts
  • Common cold
  • "Professional Guide to Diseases (Eighth Edition)" (2005)
  • Mouth lesions
  • "Professional Guide to Signs & Symptoms (Fifth Edition)" (2006)
 

Copyright notice for book excerpts: Copyright © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. All rights reserved.




More About This Book:
Title: Avoiding Common Pediatric Errors
Authors: Anthony D Slonim MD, DrPH; Lisa Marcucci MD
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Copyright: 2008
ISBN: 0-7817-7489-6

 » Next page: Herpes Simplex Virus (The 5-Minute Pediatric Consult)

Rate This Website

What do you think about the features of this website? Take our user survey and have your say:

Website User Survey

Medical Tools & Articles:

Next articles:

Tools & Services:

Medical Articles:

Forums & Message Boards

 
HONcode We subscribe to the HONcode principles

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use. Information provided on this site is for informational purposes only; it is not intended as a substitute for advice from your own medical team. The information on this site is not to be used for diagnosing or treating any health concerns you may have - please contact your physician or health care professional for all your medical needs. Please see our Terms of Use.

Home | Symptoms | Diseases | Diagnosis | Videos | Tools | Forum | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Advertise